REKEL PATENTINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

REKEL PATENT / Guide to IP matters

Industrial designs: protecting a product’s appearance

A design concerns the appearance of a product or part of it, including features such as lines, contours, colours, shape, texture and ornamentation. Protection of technical functionality and protection of appearance have different purposes. A design matter requires organising product versions, authorship, earlier disclosures and the illustrations intended for filing. Design protection may coexist with other rights, but it requires its own assessment.

Competent authority

UPRP for a Polish registered design; EUIPO for a registered EU design; WIPO under the international Hague System, with protection assessed for designated territories.

Scope and context

Rekel Patent is an information website published by Vadym Rekel. Its materials explain intellectual-property procedures and the work of qualified patent attorneys. Sources verified on 16 October 2026. Current legislation, documents, service dates and applicable procedural instructions matter in an individual case.

Stages of the procedure

  1. 01

    Identify the appearance and disclosure dates

    Review prototypes, catalogues, websites, trade fairs and initial sales. Identify which appearance needs protection and whether the applicant owns the relevant rights. Any exception concerning earlier disclosure must be assessed under the particular system rather than assuming that publication has no legal effect.

  2. 02

    Search and choose territories

    Searches for earlier designs help assess novelty and individual character. The choice between national, EU and Hague applications depends on markets, costs and the intended disclosure of the product. A new appearance should not automatically be treated as a new technical solution.

  3. 03

    Prepare the design representation

    Drawings, photographs or computer-generated views should present the product consistently. The compatibility of views, background and visible features can matter. Documents must meet the chosen office’s requirements; a written description cannot freely supply visual features missing from the illustrations.

  4. 04

    Registration and subsequent scrutiny

    Proper filing leads to examination within the scope prescribed for that procedure. A registration does not mean that every possible invalidity ground has been conclusively excluded. Afterwards, rights holders monitor the market, protection periods, ownership records and evidence needed to compare competing products. Any enforcement assessment must consider the relevant legal test and scope of protection.

Risks and decision points

  • Inconsistent illustrations can make the subject matter of protection unclear.
  • Earlier disclosure or lack of individual character may expose the right to challenge.
  • A design registration protects appearance within defined limits, rather than every feature of the product.

Legal basis and sources

Offices and courts ↗

Source library

Related processes

All processes →